7 questions to audit whether your Meta Ads structure is right after the Andromeda algorithm
Source: Central Brain · CUBO-02 · Ben Heath, Antonio Ventre, Professor Charley T, Dara Denney · Verified: ✅
In the post-Andromeda era, CBO beats ABO. The algorithm allocates budget better than you.
💡 "CBO > ABO in the Andromeda era." — Ben Heath
Meta needs options. If you only change the overlay text, the algorithm will put only 1 in auction.
❌ "5 ads that only change the overlay text → Meta will only put 1 in auction." — Dara Denney
Post-Andromeda, Advantage+ targeting beats manual targeting. The algorithm knows more than you.
💡 "Advantage+ targeting > manual targeting in 2026." — Antonio Ventre
2024's metrics aren't 2026's. CTR and CPM still matter, but there are new signals.
You don't need to split test every detail. You need "big swings" across your variants.
💡 "I am actually taking much bigger swings in my variation testing." — Dara Denney
Creatives fatigue. You need a system to rotate before CTR collapses.
If the ad promises one thing and the landing page another, you pay for the click twice.
❌ "If the ad and the landing page say different things, you're paying for the click twice." — Ben Heath
__/21 puntos
18-21: Solid structure. 14-17: Good, now optimize. 10-13: Regular, reestructura. <10: You're burning budget.
RankStudio Ads audits your creative with a deterministic Ad Score (0-100).
Try RankStudio Ads free →